About Endometriosis Excision (LAPEX)

© Center for Endometriosis Care/Ken Sinervo MD, MSc, FRCSC. All rights reserved. No reproduction permitted without written permission. Revised since original publication in 1991 and current as of 2025. No external funding was utilized in the creation of this material. The Center for Endometriosis Care neither endorses nor has affiliation with any resources cited herein. The following material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

Endometriosis: Excision Surgery

Surgery - and any/all interventions for endometriosis - remains the decision of the patient and there are no universal, guaranteed outcomes. This article discusses the specific modality of Laparoscopic Excision (LAPEX) as the surgical cornerstone of any high quality, integrative approach to treating endometriosis. This does not imply that all endometriosis patients are candidates for, or will benefit from, surgical (or any other) intervention of any kind. Every case should be approached on its own merits in careful consultation with the patient through a robust informed consent process. Read on for common discussion points surrounding this topic and also check out "Dr Albee on Excision“ and What To Expect For Your Surgery At The CEC by Wendy Winer, RN, BSN, CNOR, RNFA.

We Treat Endometriosis Surgically Using the Laparoscopic Excisional (LAPEX) Method.

The Oxford Dictionaries define excision as: “to cut out surgically; to remove by cutting. Late 16th century (in the sense 'notch or hollow out'): from Latin excis- 'cut out', from the verb excidere, from ex- 'out of' + caedere 'to cut'.” The CEC was established over three decades ago as one of the first Centers of Expertise anywhere in the world, specializing in and refining the excisional approach to effectively treating the disease. We have treated tens of thousands of patients from nearly 70 countries to date, performing over 15,000 combined procedures, with excellent long-term outcomes among the majority of those in our care.

Generally speaking, LAPEX allows for endometriosis to be cut out from affected areas without damaging surrounding structures or removing otherwise healthy tissue or organs. Again, however: not everyone is a candidate for surgery and excision is not a definitive/universal “cure.” Our experience, however, echoes the scientific literature in that LAPEX has been demonstrated to be associated with improved pain and quality of life for many individuals [Rindos et al., 2020; Pundir et al. 2017; Yeung 2014].

Rindos NB, Fulcher IR, Donnellan NM. Pain and Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Excision of Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1610-1617.e1.
Pundir J, Omanwa K, Kovoor E, Pundir V, Lancaster G, Barton-Smith P. Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 JulAug;24(5):747-756.
Yeung P Jr . The laparoscopic management of endometriosis in patients with pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Sep;41(3):371-83.

Excision Surgery is not a Cure for Endometriosis - But it May Help

We do not use the word “cure” in relation to ANY treatments for endometriosis. However, excision is the ‘gold standard’ for surgically treating the disease - especially deep endometriosis [Byrne et al., 2018] - and can be very effective at conferring relief for many who undergo the procedure. However, it is also true that not all pain is from endometriosis; that even removing all disease may not solve underlying issues for some; and that removal of endometriosis alone will not necessarily address other conditions which lend themselves to pain or symptoms. Perhaps more important than use of the word ‘cure' is addressing each patient’s concerns in a patient-centric, collaborative way to provide the best functional outcome for long-term relief and restoration of quality of life in that individual.

Byrne D, Curnow T, Smith P, Cutner A, Saridogan E, Clark TJ; BSGE Endometriosis Centres. Laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres: a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 9;8(4):e018924.

Excision Results in Lower Recurrence and Persistence of Endometriosis in Many Cases.

Like all surgeons, we have a number of patients - around 20% - who return to us for another surgery or have surgery elsewhere with findings of recurrent or persistent endometriosis. We work with our patients to ensure we are addressing the 'big picture' of their individual situation and routinely engage in collaborative referrals ranging from imaging (which we also perform) to physical therapy to pain management to dietary approach and beyond to make sure a true integrative approach is used. We also strive every day to increase disease awareness, provide training and elevate endometriosis to a priority public health platform in order to improve the time to diagnosis and effective, early - and proper - treatment for all those affected. Through timely intervention, individuals can be diagnosed and treated sooner, avoiding the vicious cycle of repeated drug therapies and ineffective surgeries that routinely characterize the disease. By educating society, legislators, insurers and the public, and by training tomorrow's providers, we can empower patients and remove the ubiquitous barriers to care that continue to exist - and one day, perhaps even make endometriosis a preventable disorder. In summary, though universal "cure" for every single individual with the disease may remain elusive, LAPEX remains a critical, effective part of the treatment picture for this disease. Nevertheless, many of our patients routinely report to us that they are painfree, many years after their surgeries.

Can Endometriosis be “Diagnosed and Treated” without Surgery?

A growing trend towards “medical diagnosis” (aka “clinical diagnosis”) driven by various ‘guidelines’ is gaining popularity. However, it is not possible to obtain biopsy-proven confirmation without surgical intervention. Whether, when, and how to proceed is the patient’s choice in the context of their own situation. It is also imperative to understand that pain - pelvic pain in particular - has many generators, and endometriosis often presents with a unique constellation of symptoms and may be accompanied by other conditions; nor should non-classic signs be undervalued, i.e., soft tissue, lung or diaphragmatic disease; bowel or bladder-only symptoms, etc. Dismissing these indications and hindering access to timely confirmative diagnosis and treatment - which can and should be accomplished in the same surgical encounter - only confound the patient’s scenario further. In addition, a ‘non-biopsy approach’ to diagnosis dilutes the research effort; conducting studies on uncertain or induced “endometriosis” leads to uncertain results and hinders progress. It is of course prudent to rule out differential diagnoses and use all tools in the armamentarium, but physical examination, imaging and lab studies related to an endometriosis diagnosis are heavily operator-dependent with varying sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Hence, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The choice to intervene medically or surgically should be the patient’s after fully informed consent and thorough discussion of the pros and cons of all approaches.

Just as it matters who reads and interprets imaging and other studies, who performs the surgery, how and when is of critical importance, as excision is a highly advanced surgical technique requiring extensive training. Likewise, accuracy in diagnosis and treatment is dependent on the ability of the surgeon to recognize disease in all its different manifestations. This means, if the surgeon is not familiar with all signs of endometriosis including those less common such as subtle areas of peritoneal tension, atypical clear vesicles, extrapelvic endometriosis, etc. then disease will be missed and left behind untreated; surgeons can only see and treat what they recognize. It is also imperative that a patient-centric, judicious - even conservative - approach is utilized; planning each individual’s case based on their very specific needs and desired outcomes is critical. Endometriosis treatment is not one-size-fits-all, and patients need a specialist who will work with them on a personalized care plan - when the plan involves surgery, it is imperative the surgery be performed by those with advanced skill.

My Surgeon Performed Laser Surgery. Is that Excision? What about Robotic Assisted Surgery? Which is Better?

All surgeons - and surgeries - are not equal. Significant confusion often persists around the surgical approaches for endometriosis. The laser is a tool, not a method. Laparoscopy is a surgical approach, not a tool. It is important to understand that tool and method are not nearly as important as skill of the surgeon: if they cannot excise, they cannot excise using any method or tool. Be sure you know which approach they are using. For example, the laser can be used to safely and successfully perform Laparoscopic resection (excision) of all disease, as we have pioneered here in Dr Sinervo’s Center – or it can be used to superficially and incompletely burn or ablate surface lesions and leave disease behind as many obgyn generalists do.  The approach and tool are not nearly as important as the skill of the surgeon who uses them.

Laser ablation (not to be confused with uterine ablation, a different procedure entirely) and other superficial methods commonly performed by non-excisionists merely char surface tissue, making microscopic evaluation impossible and often leaving behind endometriosis – which may lead to recurrence and potential complications in future surgical interventions. In one study, for example, improvement in most symptom measures and quality of life indicators was found in endometriosis patients following excision, as compared to the ablation technique in which participants indicated either no improvement or a worsened symptom and quality of life status [Mackenzie, 2023]. Excision is not typically performed for endometriosis treatment outside the tertiary specialty centers, though the technique has been commonly used for a multitude of surgical conditions almost since the inception of surgery itself, so be sure to ask questions. It’s imperative to determine which method your surgeon will be using and understand their disease knowledge, approach and expected outcomes.

Mackenzie M. Laparoscopic Excision Vs Ablation: “Endometriosis Facebook” Symptom And Qol Questionnaire Results. AJOG. Volume 228, Issue 3, Supplement, S901-S902, March 2023.

Why is Endometriosis So Poorly Managed in General?

Stark and persistent misunderstandings and biases continue to surround endometriosis. Often dismissed as simply ‘killer cramps’ that are ‘normal’, or worse - ‘in your head,’ the disease causes considerable negative impact on quality of life, especially in the domains of pain and psychosocial functioning [Culley et al., 2013]. Endometriosis can also cause physical and psychological damage when left untreated or treated unsuccessfully [Dell'oro et al., 2013]…yet an incalculable lack of disease knowledge persists. In the general healthcare community including at the OB/GYN level, for example, it is taught (and hence practiced) that the most frequent mainstays of treatment are medical suppressives and ablative surgery. While always an option for those who desire it, patients should understand that medication does not eradicate endometriosis. The disease does not simply ‘go away’ as a result of drug suppression. At best, such a course of therapy provides only a temporary means of symptom improvement, not definitive treatment. Often, side effects of many endometriosis drug therapies are significantly negative and intolerable, and may last far beyond the cessation of treatment. Poor outcomes on suppression therapies are routine and drug therapy that can destroy endometriosis permanently has yet to be discovered. Hormonal suppression has “no effect on adhesion of endometriotic cells and cannot improve fertility” [Aznaurova et al., 2014], and success of said therapies may be dependent on localization/type of lesions, with superficial peritoneal/ovarian disease responding better than deep/infiltrative disease. Still, despite evidence to the contrary, some providers prefer - and impose their preference on to their patients - the option of medical management and even “diagnosis” by undertaking a strategy of ‘treat without seeing.’

In the majority of such cases, further diagnostic and definitive treatment delays – and patient dissatisfaction – are highly common. The best such medications can do is suppress the disease on a short-term basis, and symptoms undoubtedly recur at cessation of therapy. Suppressive therapies are further limited in usefulness by the length of time they can be safely taken (usually six-twelve months), their high cost, and commonly incapacitating side effects. Hence, the sooner in an individual’s life the disease can be correctly diagnosed and truly eradicated, the better their long-term outlook becomes.

Poor surgical outcomes also remain commonplace. Incomplete or poorly done surgery means the patient must still deal with any residual symptoms of the endometriosis left behind. Many times, "limited surgery" results in skimming/burning the top off the area of deep disease, leaving behind the bulk of endometriosis. This is not excisional and allows for subsequent adhesion formation to bury remaining disease. Disease covered by new adhesions increases pain, leaving a very dissatisfied patient. Burning/ablation, coagulation and other superficial approaches – without or without medical suppression - routinely result in poor outcomes and inevitably require costly reoperation in the future, subjecting the patient to additional procedures, increased expense and surgical risks – yet this sadly remains the ordinary approach to endometriosis. Still, there is hope!

Surgery (when appropriate, in the proper hands, and for the right patient), alternative therapies, diet and nutrition, acupuncture, physical therapy, medications, and other adjuncts can all be helpful for symptom management. As noted, we believe high-quality, minimally invasive excisional surgery is the key to building an effective plan. One need only spend time immersed in the patient population to realize the far-reaching physical and emotional impact of the disease and the toll repeated surgical and medical interventions take, though the literature is often far removed from such first-hand experience(s). Above all, genuine compassion for those who battle this insidious illness must be present.

Culley L, Law C, Hudson N, Denny E, Mitchell H, Baumgarten M, Raine-Fenning N. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women's lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):625-39.
Dell'oro M, Collinet P, Robin G, Rubod C. Multidisciplinary approach for deep endometriosis: interests and organization. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013 Jan;41(1):58-64.
Aznaurova YB, Zhumataev MB, Roberts TK, Aliper AM, Zhavoronkov AA. Molecular aspects of development and regulation of endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jun 13;12:50.

Why Don’t Specialty Excision Centers Accept Insurance for Excision Surgery?

This is a highly misunderstood premise. Many excision centers including ours DO accept insurance, as an out of network provider. We, like other specialists in the disease and various other health subspecialties, are not ‘cash only’ and certainly accept out of network benefits. To better understand insurance and endometriosis care in a specialty center, please read on:

Insurers have requirements for how the doctor practices. They incentivize quantity over quality, encourage policy holders to seek cheaper - yet possibly subpar - care with clinicians who do not specialize in the disease and routinely do not reimburse or reward high quality treatment, with complicated reimbursement strategies (and penalties); all done while cutting the patient out of the process. Surgical destruction of endometriosis by any means shares the same universal billing code (CPT) and henceforth is reimbursed accordingly. That is to say, excision is not - but should be! - categorized as its own CPT, something we have been lobbying for strongly for years; or at the very least, reimbursed accordingly to lesser surgical removal like coagulation, etc. To that end, our current healthcare system rewards an approach of untreated/poorly treated disease – leading to certain failure and need for retreatment, thus incurring additional costs and subjecting the patient to ongoing care. This failed bureaucracy contributes greatly to the ever-growing fiscal burden the disease imposes on society – and the patient.

As we have said for years, reimbursement for endometriosis is a broken system:

  • No incentives exist to improve quality of - or perform specialized – treatment for endometriosis;

  • The current system rewards an approach towards untreated/poorly treated disease; and

  • Surgeons should not be punished or forced to offer subpar care to their patients based on the ill-informed assumptions and decisions made by those who do not understand this disease (e.g., payers).

This protocol is a huge disservice and accounts for lack of reimbursement strategies which would otherwise accurately reflect the true nature of the disease and the critical need for highly skilled surgeons to treat it. Unfortunately, referrals and reimbursements to the specialist centers like ours are often withheld injudiciously due to lack of understanding about the disease and are based loosely on outdated beliefs and unproven concepts, not least of which include the framing of endometriosis as simply normal tissue in abnormal locations and other flawed notions that have largely been based on underpowered studies.

What being ‘out of network’ means in the context of our practice: we work for our patients, not the insurance companies. Although we are a specialized surgical practice that routinely employs ever-improving teamwork, communication and readiness for our cases, we are able to increase productivity and maximize outcomes while actually decreasing costs. Without the red tape of who/when/how long/what for, we can provide personalized, continuous care through both quality outcomes and cost-containment – and by working one on one with our patients to offer individualized, compassionate care based on the specifics of their own case (this includes discounts for many of patients). We also do first check, file all the paperwork, handle the appeals and everything an in-network provider would do. Learn more about insurance and treatment at the CEC here.

Is Excision Right for You?

Again, not everyone is a candidate for surgery of any kind, and there are no guarantees that excision - or any treatment at all - will confer total relief. However, based on our decades-long experience in operating on the countless advanced cases of endometriosis that we treat and managing the complex care of thousands and thousands of our patients from every corner of the world, we expect that the majority of those for whom surgery is indicated will find improvements in quality of life and overall functioning (as well as fertility, if desired). We must first evaluate the patient’s case, however, and review all the factors of their personal situation, which we will gladly do for free through our initial case review. We will provide a thorough evaluation and offer our honest opinion about the likelihood for expected outcomes in our surgical candidates.

I Had Excision Surgery but did not Obtain Relief. What’s Going on??

There is perhaps nothing more frustrating and upsetting than feeling like your ‘best-hope-for-relief-surgery’ didn’t work. This is a multifaceted, complex issue that may occur – even following excision in the hands of a specialist. While this matter has to be discussed with one’s surgeon directly to determine the next best steps for the indivdual, we have an article topically addressing this topic here for preliminary information.

Do you have any References Supporting the use of Excision?

Following is a small sampling from the greater body of scientific literature on excision and surgery for endometriosis dating back 30+ years:

*2025 Update: There has been an important standardized terminology update to the condition previously referred to as Interstitial Cystitis and/or Bladder Pain Syndrome. In a change led by the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecologic Association, the disorder has now been renamed Female Bladder Pain Syndrome (FBPS), in order to improve clarity of diagnosis and clinical care. The new term was arrived at by consensus opinion, and aims to help doctors, researchers, and patients better understand and address the condition by focusing on its unique characteristics in women and those assigned female at birth. - Joint Terminology Report: Terminology Standardization for Female Bladder Pain Syndrome. Urogynecology (Phila). Published online January 6, 2025. Developed by the Joint Writing Group of American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association.